ferenc.rocks/

Proof

Real systems, real constraints, practical work.

Every project was different, but each started with something useful that already worked. The next safe step was unclear.

The work covers live platforms, inherited products, internal workflows, booking logic, integrations, migrations, messy data, and early-stage product work.

These were real systems, not demos, with users, business rules, edge cases, and consequences.

A folder of labelled evidence from real systems and project work.
fig. 01 — filed work, not demo reels

Examples from systems that had consequences.

Selected work

2019–2024 · Booking platform

Travelminit

I worked on a live accommodation booking system. Booking rules, pricing, availability, partner integrations, and migrations affected day-to-day operations.

Useful when a system already matters, has grown messy, and changes need to account for what they affect.

Read the Travelminit project note

TECH: PHP, MySQL, partner APIs, channel-manager integrations, iCal sync, mobile web.

2012–2016 · Grant platform

Go Grants

I worked on an inherited production platform with dynamic forms, complex reporting, admin workflows, and performance problems under deadline pressure.

Useful when the system still has to run, even though its code, data, and business rules are no longer clean.

Read the Go Grants project note

TECH: PHP, Zend Framework, MySQL, SQL/EAV, jQuery, performance optimization.

2025 · Internal workflow

Guesthouse admin system

I built a custom admin system for a small hospitality business. Its shared spreadsheet no longer handled rooms, bookings, clients, services, prices, and change history well.

Useful when a spreadsheet has become part of daily operations, but no longer gives the team enough clarity or control.

Read the guesthouse admin system project note

TECH: Laravel, Livewire.

2017–2019 · Product rescue

Authorized.by

I moved an unfinished AngularJS frontend closer to launch by stabilizing the app, setting up the build process, fixing browser/mobile issues, and rebuilding the embeddable badge with a much smaller footprint.

Useful when a product is close to launch, but still too fragile, unfinished, or tangled to ship confidently.

Read the Authorized.by project note

TECH: AngularJS, Preact, Webpack, jQuery, mobile web.

Current and independent work

2026–present · Booking workflow

FishFlow

I am building FishFlow around how small fishing lake operators handle bookings: manual confirmation, resources, cabins, docks, boats, time slots, and lake-specific rules.

The difficult part is understanding how the business handles availability, requests, and exceptions, not simply making a calendar.

Read the FishFlow project note

TECH: Laravel, Livewire.

2026 · AI data pipeline

retro.dog

I built a public AI-assisted pipeline that crawls marketplace listings, filters noise, enriches messy data, controls cost, and keeps human review in the loop before anything is published.

Useful when AI supports a real workflow without replacing judgment, especially when the data is noisy, incomplete, expensive, or hard to trust.

Read the retro.dog project note

TECH: Laravel, NodeJS, LLM pipeline.

Earlier product work

2016–2017 · Startup product

Doorie

I worked across backend architecture, admin functionality, and mobile APIs while the product was still taking shape inside a small team.

Useful for projects that need someone who understands the product, makes technical decisions, and keeps work moving across several technical areas.

Read the Doorie project note

TECH: MeteorJS / Node.js, MongoDB, React.

What these examples have in common

Different projects. Similar starting points.

The projects differ, but the useful work often begins in the same situation:

  • “This system matters, but we are not sure what is safe to touch.”
  • “The workflow works because people compensate for the software.”
  • “The business rules are real, but they live in code, spreadsheets, admin screens, or memory.”
  • “The data has to move, sync, or be cleaned up, but the edge cases matter.”
  • “AI might help, but only if someone understands the workflow and reviews the output.”

The work begins by understanding the real situation and making the risks visible. Then the system can move forward without pretending the mess is simpler than it is.

Describe the system

Start with the closest example

Recognize your situation in one of these projects?

Start with the closest example. Tell me which part feels familiar, where your system is stuck, and what would make the next few weeks easier.

A few sentences are enough. I will read the message myself and usually reply with a few questions or suggest a short conversation.